If Bush ate a baby....by Ann Coulter
Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 03:04:57 PM PDT
After reading Ann Coulter's latest
"article", which makes a downright acrobatic attempt to somehow blame Gannon/Guckert on the Democrats,
I once again was forced to wonder what kind of "article" she might write if it was discovered, irrefutibly, that George Bush had finally gone and done something so horrible, that it could no longer be denied. Like if he ate a baby.
Would Ann finally have to admit that the mighty teat she's been suckling the sustenance from for oh so long, had finally gone and dried up? Would she realize that all this time she's been shilling her integrity away for a madman? Or would she simply belly up to the keyboard and pen something like this:
Article below the fold
Oh Baby
by Ann Coulter
Well can you believe the latest tizzy the left has gotten itself into since it was discovered recently, that the President was discovered to have allegedly feasted on the flesh of an infant?
The liberal press has attempted once again to create a firestorm of controversy by taking facts out of context and twisting the story to suit it's own devious purposes.
All of this comes as no surprise, but it is still hard to stomach the manufactured outrage coming from a democrat party that we all know has no love lost between itself and infants.
These advocates of on-demand abortion and second chance contraception have suddenly, in light of recent events, decided that miraculously, they now wish to (gasp)
defend children from those who would wish to dine on their tender young carcasses. Where were they when the battle over the Lacy Peterson law (making the willful destruction of a fetus equal to the crime of murder) was being fought in the trenches? I'll tell you where they were. Right smack dab in the center of the pity pot, as the federal courts decided that democrats would finally be forced to remove thier filthy child-murdering hands from the the money pot of abortion clinics and womens health advocate groups that council women to murder their babies.
Make no mistake, they are hypocrites, one and all.
It is amazing how indignant the left has now become, now that they have realized what a political windfall they can reap from this overblown, overhyped controversy.
The fact is, that liberal pundits like C. Everett Coop and Howard Dean, Socialist movements such as the A.M.A and the Department of Children and Family Services, and all the other liberal scum who have conveninetly decided to blatantly grandstand, distorting the facts in this case so shamelessly, are all just further proof that the left will stop at nothing in their scrurrilous and desperate attempt to reclaim lost power.
The President ate a baby. So what? If my President decides he has developed a taste for baby food, who am I to judge? So conveniently we forget how many children have been saved by the policies of George Bush. If the Democrats had been in power, surely the child that the president ate would have been left behind, caught up in the twisted maze of bureaucracy and red tape of the Democrats tax and spend reality that would be our school system were it left to them to destroy.
In the Op-Ed page of the liberal New York Times, Maureen Dowd brazenly lied, saying that
"George Bush has taken away a life filled with unbound potential". As we are all aware of by now, the President has made it clear that he went to great pains to eat a baby that was already terminally ill. That baby was officially diagnosed to have no more than three years left in it's life. There was no unbound potential there, a fact that when the light is shown upon it, suddenly makes Ms. Dowds house of cards collapse like Max Cleland without a wheelchair.
It has also been reported on Fox News's Hannity and Colmes, that the infant now known as
'Baby P',was a distant cousin of none other than Sheik Mohummed Ali Karzakistan, which is a very terrorist sounding name, wouldn't you agree?
In fact, it does not take a very big stretch of the imagination to realize that it is quite possible that the baby the President found fit for consumption, had it lived, could have one day grown up to become the most horrible dictator known to mankind. Whoever can prove to me that it wouldn't have been, I'll spend three weeks on my knees with showing my undying gratitude to.
No, folks. Sorry. Nothing to see here. I know that Al Franken, Micheal Moore and those pajama-clad losers at Daily Kos will be disappointed to once again come up short, but it is time for the left to finally realize that they are all but mere mortals in the presence of George Bush, who is himself of the flesh of the holy and the almighty. I sure know that I would be honored to be eaten by a man of such faith.
George Bush truly works in mysterious ways, but we must never forget that he is always motivated by his vision for the betterment of mankind. To his critics I say to you, If eating a baby is what it's going to take to improve mankind and reclaim this land from the liberal fascists of the world who wish to destroy her, I say, "pass the butter Mr. President".
Permalink | 124 comments